• Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation
Revenue NSW logo
  • About us
  • Help centre
  • News
  • Login
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • Taxes, duties, levies and royalties Expand this menu
    Return to previous menu Taxes, duties, levies and royalties
    • Make a payment
    • Payroll tax
    • Land tax
    • Transfer duty
    • More options
  • Fines and fees Expand this menu
    Return to previous menu Fines and fees
    • Pay your fine
    • Request a review
    • Nominate someone else
    • Overdue fines and fees
    • More options
  • Grants and schemes Expand this menu
    Return to previous menu Grants and schemes
    • First home owner grant
    • First home buyer assistance
    • HomeBuilder
    • Previous schemes
    • More options
  • Unclaimed money Expand this menu
    Return to previous menu Unclaimed money
    • Search for unclaimed money
    • Make a claim
    • Lodge unclaimed money
    • More options
  • About us
  • Help centre
  • News
  • Login
  • Contact us
alert icon

Read more about HomeBuilder and other relief measures to help customers impacted by COVID-19.

Help centre
  • About

    Find our top tasks, calculators and publications

  • Make a payment

    Quickly pay your liability or fine

  • Online services

    Register, manage and pay, and check service availability

  • Calculators

    Calculate your liability or grant amount

  • Resources

    Search our publications, forms, rulings and documents

  • Legislation and rulings

    Clarification and examples to help you comply

  • Seminars and webinars

    Download information packs and register for upcoming events

  • Contact us

    Our details if you need to reach us

  • Home
  • Help centre
  • Resources
  • [2011] NSWADTAP 46
Listen

Haddad v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2011] NSWADTAP 46

Date of judgement 10 October 2011
Proceeding number 119005
Judge(s) D Patten, Deputy President
R Perrignon, Judicial Member
C Bennett, Non Judicial Member
Court or TribunalAdministrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel

Legislation cited

Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997

Land Tax Management Act 1956

Catchwords

Costs - No question of principle

Cases cited

Haddad v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [No 2] [2011] NSWADT 215

Summary

On 12 August 2011, the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel ("the Appeal Panel") delivered a judgement dismissing the application and affirming the decision at first instance to refuse the applicant an exemption from land tax for the 2004 – 2009 land tax years under the principal place of residence exemption in Schedule 1A of the Land Tax Management Act 1956 ("the Act").

Both parties were invited to apply for their costs and both chose to do so. The appellant was ordered to pay the Chief Commissioner's costs of the appeal as agreed upon or assessed.

Background

The applicant had appealed on a question of law from a decision of the Tribunal on 27 January 2011 and also sought leave to have the appeal extended to the merits. The Tribunal at first instance had confirmed the Chief Commissioner’s assessment, but refused applications from both parties for costs.

The Appeal Panel found no error of law by the Tribunal at first instance and refused to grant leave to extend the appeal to the merits. The application was dismissed and the parties were invited to apply for their costs of the appeal.

Both the Chief Commissioner and the applicant applied for costs, although the applicant was not represented by a solicitor or a professional agent but by her husband. The costs applications were heard on the papers.

Decision

The Appeal Panel noted that the making of a costs order in the Administrative Decisions Tribunal is governed by s.88 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997.

The Appeal Panel held that as a matter of clear law, the appeal was bound to fail, a factor to be taken into account under s.88(1A)(c). That section provides that the Tribunal may award costs in relation to proceedings before it only if it is satisfied that it is fair to do so having regard to a number of factors, including:

  1. “the relative strengths of the claims made by each of the parties, including whether a party has made a claim that has no tenable basis in fact or law;”

The Appeal Panel found that it is relevant to take into account the fact that the appellant failed at first instance on the same preliminary point as it did before the Appeal Panel, that is, that the land was not "residential land" under the Act because it was being rented out.

In light of s.88(1A)(c), the Appeal Panel was satisfied that it was fair to award costs of the appeal to the Chief Commissioner, either as agreed between the parties or (if agreement is not reached) as assessed.

Link to decision

Haddad v Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2011] NSWADTAP 46

  • Previous
    [2011] NSWADTAP 52
  • Back to top
  • Next
    [2011] NSWADTAP 41
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Email
  • Download or print PDF
  • Taxes, duties, levies and royalties
  • Fines and fees
  • Grants and schemes
  • Unclaimed money
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • nsw.gov.au
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn