• Skip to content
  • Skip to navigation
alert icon

If you are experiencing difficulties as a result of a natural disaster in NSW, please contact us to discuss your options. Read more
Impacted by a recent data breach? If your information has been used inappropriately in relation to a fine, call 1300 138 118.
If you've received a COVID-19 fine, find out if you need to pay or are entitled to a refund by calling 1300 138 118.

nsw logo NSW Government
Revenue
  • About us
  • Help centre
  • News
  • Login
  • Contact us
  • Taxes, duties, levies and royalties
    • Make a payment
    • Land tax
    • Payroll tax
    • Property tax
    • Transfer duty
    • Royalties
    • Gaming and wagering
    • Health insurance levy
    • Insurance duty
    • Parking space levy
    • Foreign buyers and land owners
    • Motor vehicle duty
    • Passenger service levy
    • Emergency services levy
    • Income tax equivalent regime
  • Fines and fees
    • Fines
    • Fees
    • Advocates and sponsors
    • Support and community services
  • Grants and schemes
    • First Home Buyers Assistance Scheme
    • First Home Owner (New Homes) Grant
    • Shared Equity Home Buyer Helper
    • Electric Vehicle Rebate
    • Electric Vehicle Stamp Duty Refund
    • Previous schemes
  • Unclaimed money
    • Search and make a claim
    • Proof of ownership
    • Return unclaimed money
  • About us
  • Help centre
  • News
  • Login
  • Contact us
    Taxes, duties, levies and royalties
  • Make a payment
  • Land tax
  • Payroll tax
  • Property tax
  • Transfer duty
  • Royalties
  • Gaming and wagering
  • Health insurance levy
  • Insurance duty
  • Parking space levy
  • Foreign buyers and land owners
  • Motor vehicle duty
  • Passenger service levy
  • Emergency services levy
  • Income tax equivalent regime
Are gig economy workers employees or contractors for payroll tax?

Gig workers can be considered independent contractors or employees, or sometimes the platform operator is classed as an employment agent. It depends on the business structure and the workers’ employment relationship. Click the arrow to read the new ‘Gig economy businesses’ page.

    Fines and fees
  • Fines
  • Fees
  • Advocates and sponsors
  • Support and community services
Fees and Fines - Revenue NSW

Pay now or learn about your options to manage your fines and fees.

    Grants and schemes
  • First Home Buyers Assistance Scheme
  • First Home Owner (New Homes) Grant
  • Shared Equity Home Buyer Helper
  • Electric Vehicle Rebate
  • Electric Vehicle Stamp Duty Refund
  • Previous schemes
Grants and schemes

From home buyer to electric vehicle, we issue and administer a range of grants and schemes.

    Unclaimed money
  • Search and make a claim
  • Proof of ownership
  • Return unclaimed money
Help centre
  • About

    Find our top tasks, calculators and publications

  • Make a payment

    Quickly pay your liability or fine

  • Online services

    Register, manage and pay, and check service availability

  • Calculators

    Calculate your liability or grant amount

  • Resources

    Search our publications, forms, rulings and documents

  • Legislation and rulings

    Clarification and examples to help you comply

  • Education library

    Videos to raise awareness of taxes, grants and services

  • Contact us

    Our details if you need to reach us

  • Home
  • Help centre
  • Resources
  • [2017] NSWCATAD 106
Listen

Pandanas Qld Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue; Harris v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue; O’Shea v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue; Brown v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2017] NSWCATAD 106

Date of judgement 4 April 2017
Proceeding number 1510821 1610012 1610037 1610269 1610270 1610271 1610272 1610273 1610274
Judge(s) J Harris SC, Senior Member
Court or TribunalNew South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal

Legislation cited

Duties Act 1997, Division 1A of Part 8 of Chapter 2

Strata Titles Act 1973

Catchwords

Duties Act 1997 - New Home Grant Scheme - meaning of “home”, “residence”

Cases cited

Cornish Investments Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWADTAP 25

Gauci v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 135 CLR 81

Marana Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCAFC 307

Re Taylor [1995] 2 QdR 564

Background

In 1973 the Pottsville Motel (the motel) was constructed. On 5 September 2011, the motel was purchased by Pottsville Beach Pty Ltd. Initially, the company continued to operate the motel. Mr Shane Harris was at all relevant times the director of that company.

Mr Harris, a builder, undertook renovations of the motel. Pottsville Beach Pty Ltd lodged an application with Tweed Shire Council for a strata subdivision consisting of 25 lots, which was ultimately granted with attached By-laws. Clause 31 of the By-laws stated that all lots “shall only be used for short term holiday/tourist accommodation purposes” (ie up to 90 days) and “shall not be used for any form of permanent residential occupation”.

Between February 2014 and August 2014, a number of the units were sold, and the purchasers lodged applications for a grant under the New Home Grant Scheme pursuant to Division 1A of Part 8 of Chapter 2 of the Duties Act 1997. Section 69 provides:

The nature of the scheme

This scheme is intended to help people who are acquiring a new home that is their first home. Under the scheme, the acquisition is subject to a concession or exemption from duty.

The definition of “home” and “new home” in s.87G is:

87G Definitions

In this Division:

home means a building (affixed to land) that:

  1. may lawfully be used as a place of residence, and
  2. is, in the Chief Commissioner’s opinion, a suitable building for use as a place of residence.

new home means a home that has not been previously occupied or sold as a place of residence.

Further, s.83 relevantly provides:

83 Types of agreements or transfers that are eligible

…

  1. In relation to a new home purchase or an off the plan purchase only, a reference in this Division to a new home includes a reference to a substantially renovated home.
  2. A substantially renovated home is a renovated home:
    1. that is new residential premises within the meaning of section 40–75 (1) (b) of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 of the Commonwealth, and
    2. that, as renovated, has not been previously occupied or sold as a place of residence…

In issue was whether each of the units were “new” when the Applicants took possession. The basis of this assertion was that the renovations and re-configuration was such that when the applicants took possession, the units had been substantially renovated and therefore “new”.

Initially, Mr Shane Harris commenced proceedings in his own name on behalf of several Applicants. This proceeding was dismissed and individual Applicants commenced their own proceedings which were heard together, arising as they did out of the same factual background and turning on the same legal issues.

Mr Harris gave evidence about the extent of the renovations carried out by him to the motel, although he was unable to produce records to show the extensive work on the units. He also gave evidence that there were permanent residents in some of the units. The Tribunal understood Mr Harris’ reference to “permanent residents” to mean guests who stayed for longer periods of up to 90 days.

Decision

The Tribunal concluded that the evidence did not establish that on the balance of probabilities that the work performed to renovate the motel satisfied the statutory requirements to be described as “substantial renovations” so as to allow the units to fall into the statutory definition of a new home: (para 28).

Further, the Tribunal held that the individual units did not meet the statutory definition of a “home”, being a building which may be lawfully used as a place of residence: (para 30). The Tribunal also held that the units did not meet the definition of “homes” as they could not “lawfully” be used as residences, noting clause 31 of the By-Laws: (para 34). The Tribunal applied the reasoning in Re Taylor [1995] 2QdR that a by-law is a law binding on all, and not merely an agreement: (para 35).

All of the Applications were dismissed.

Link to decision

Pandanas Qld Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue; Harris v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue; O’Shea v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue; Brown v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2017] NSWCATAD 106

  • Previous
    [2017] NSWCATAD 117
  • Back to top
  • Next
    [2017] NSWCATAD 100

    Help centre

    • Make a payment

    • Online services

    • Calculators

    • Resources

    • Objections and reviews
    • Data and statistics
    • Guidelines to unused casual parking space exemption
    • Guidelines as to the Unleased Tenant’s Parking Space Exemption
    • State Revenue Legislation Further Amendment Act 2020
    • Step-by-step guide to payroll tax
    • Privacy collection notice – property Tax
    • Other

    • Online services status

    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Email
  • Download or print PDF
  • Taxes, duties, levies and royalties
  • Fines and fees
  • Grants and schemes
  • Unclaimed money
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Sitemap
  • nsw.gov.au
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn